1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910971359103321

Autore

Ramey R. Chace <1978->

Titolo

Student First Amendment speech and expression rights : armbands to bong hits / / R. Chace Ramey

Pubbl/distr/stampa

El Paso, : LFB Scholarly Pub., 2011

ISBN

9781593326937

1593326939

Edizione

[1st ed.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (193 p.)

Collana

Law and society : recent scholarship

Disciplina

342.7308/5

Soggetti

Freedom of expression - United States

Students - Legal status, laws, etc - United States

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

CONTENTS; PART I. Opening the School House Gates; CHAPTER 1. Wearing Tinker's Armband; CHAPTER 2. Matthew Fraser: Lewd or Just Funny?; CHAPTER 3. Extra Extra!!! The Administration Decides if YouRead all about It!; CHAPTER 4. Back to Black; CHAPTER 5. No Bong HiTS for Students ... or Jesus; PART II. Beyond Armbands, Bong HiTS, and Assemblies; CHAPTER 6. Broadly Defining Co-Curricular and School-Sponsored Activities; CHAPTER 7. Distribution of Student-Published or PromotedMaterials; CHAPTER 8. Classroom and Curricular Activities

CHAPTER 9. Student Campaigns, Elections, Protests and otherPolitical SpeechCHAPTER 10. The Student Athlete and Free Speech; CHAPTER 11. (Not) Saying the Pledge of Allegiance; CHAPTER 12. Confederate Flags, Coed Naked, and Heavy MetalIcons: What Not to Wear to School; CHAPTER 13. BF4eva ; ) - Student Posting, Texting, andBlogging - LOL...; CHAPTER 14. Free Speech or Free from Potential Harm; PART III. CHAPTER 15. Touring the Student Speech andExpression Legal Landscape; References; Index

Sommario/riassunto

Ramey examines the legal boundaries of student speech and expression rights in school, as developed and defined by the U.S. federal courts. At issue is the proper extent of student speech and expressive conduct protected under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The purpose of discussing these decisions is to better



enable educators to make informed decisions regarding student speech and expression in school. Ramey focuses on the Supreme Court's four main student speech and expression decisions: in Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Sch. Dist. (1969), Bethel Sch. Dist. v. Fraser (1986), Haz