| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910795440903321 |
|
|
Autore |
Georgakopoulos Agelos |
|
|
Titolo |
The planar cubic Cayley graphs / / Agelos Georgakopoulos |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Providence, Rhode Island : , : American Mathematical Society, , 2017 |
|
©2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (87 pages) : illustrations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, , 1947-6221 ; ; Volume 250, Number 1190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Cayley graphs |
Graph connectivity |
Graph theory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introductory material and basic facts -- The finite and 1-ended cubic planar Cayley graphs -- The planar multi-ended Cayley graphs with 2 generators -- The planar multi-ended Cayley graphs generated by 3 involutions -- Outlook -- Bibliography. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910967295803321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research / / Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine of the National Academies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Washington, D.C., : National Academies Press, c2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
9786612412547 |
9781282412545 |
128241254X |
9780309138376 |
030913837X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (252 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Medicine - Research - United States |
Medical policy - United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
""Reviewers""; ""Foreword""; ""Preface""; ""Acknowledgments""; ""Contents""; ""Boxes, Figures, and Tables""; ""Summary""; ""1 Introduction""; ""2 What Is Comparative Effectiveness Research?""; ""3 Obtaining Input to Identify National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research""; ""4 The Criteria and Process for Setting Priorities""; ""5 Priorities for Study""; ""6 Essential Priorities for a Robust CER Enterprise""; ""Appendix A: Public Meeting Agenda�March 20, 2009""; ""Appendix B: Stakeholder Questionnaire""; ""Appendix C: Data Tables: Burden of Disease and Variation of Care"" |
""Appendix D: Cardiovascular and Peripheral Vascular Cover Sheet""""Appendix E: Definitions of Medical Terminology in CER Priority List""; ""Appendix F: Committee Biographies"" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Clinical research presents health care providers with information on the natural history and clinical presentations of disease as well as diagnostic and treatment options. In today's healthcare system, patients, physicians, clinicians and family caregivers often lack the sufficient scientific data and evidence they need to determine the best |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
course of treatment for the patients' medical conditions. Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) is designed to fill this knowledge gap by assisting patients and healthcare providers across diverse settings in making more informed decisions. In this 2009 report, the Institute of Medicine's Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization establishes a working definition of CER, develops a priority list of research topics, and identifies the necessary requirements to support a robust and sustainable CER enterprise. As part of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Congress appropriated $1.1 billion in federal support of CER, reflecting legislators' belief that better decisions about the use of health care could improve the public's health and reduce the cost of care. The Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization was successful in preparing a list 100 top priority CER topics and 10 recommendations for best practices in the field. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |