1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910966737203321

Autore

Irwin Timothy

Titolo

Public money for private infrastructure : deciding when to offer guarantees, output-based subsidies, and other forms of fiscal support for privately provided infrastructure services / / Timothy Irwin

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Washington, D.C., : World Bank, 2003

ISBN

1-280-08659-9

9786610086597

0-585-47292-0

Edizione

[1st ed.]

Descrizione fisica

ix, 54 pages : illustrations ; ; 26 cm

Collana

World Bank working paper ; ; no. 10

Disciplina

338.9

Soggetti

Infrastructure (Economics) - Finance

Economic assistance, Domestic

Public-private sector cooperation

Capital investments

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references.

Nota di contenuto

Intro -- CONTENTS -- Foreword -- Abstract -- Acknowledgments -- 1 Summary -- 2 Introduction -- 3 Clarifying the Objectives of Fiscal Support -- 4 Considering Policy Options Other Than Fiscal Support -- 5 Identifying the Instruments of Fiscal Support -- 6 Comparing the Cost of Different Instruments -- 7 Comparing the Accuracy of Different Instruments -- 8 Narrowing Down the Choice by Considering Transparency and Targeting -- 9 Improving Institutions for Decisionmaking -- 10 Concluding Remarks -- Annex: Valuing Revenue Guarantees and Variable Subsidies -- References -- BOXES -- FIGURES -- TABLES.

Sommario/riassunto

Government decisions are rarely driven solely by the dictates of cost-benefit analyses. Generating good decision making about fiscal support also requires processes for decision making that facilitate good analysis and temper the influence of self-interest.; This report sets out a framework intended to help governments make better decisions about giving fiscal support for private infrastructure services and provides some tools to facilitate analysis. Several policies to enhance



the collocation of information, incentives and decisions are proposed: giving responsibility to people working on the objective (rather than the instrument or the infrastructure service); separating decision making from delivery; involving those responsible for costs; utilizing decision making forums that emphasize tradeoffs; routinely generating information on costs and benefits; requiring routine disclosure of information; charging for certain types of support; and ensuring accountability for decisions.