| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910964961003321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Speaking of Europe : approaches to complexity in European political discourse / / edited by Kjersti Flottum, University of Bergen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Amsterdam, : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
9781299396425 |
1299396429 |
9789027272034 |
9027272034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (199 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture ; ; 49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Discourse analysis - Political aspects |
Ethnicity - Europe |
Nationalism - Europe |
Europe Politics and government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Speaking of Europe; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Acknowledgements; Speaking of and within the EU - Introduction; 1. Acknowledging the complexities of EU discourse; 2. Aims; 3. Empirical support; 4. The Eurling Group; 5. The three levels of complexity; 5.1 Historical-political contextual complexities; 5.2 Situational and rhetorical complexity; 5.3 Linguistic-textual complexities (language use); 6. Sources of inspiration; 7. The structure of the book; References; Speaking to Europe; 1. Introduction |
2. Speech making in our time: From delimited rhetorical situation to complex situationality3. Textual-contextual analysis of Prime Minister Blair's speech; 3.1 The dramatism of Kenneth Burke; 3.2 The Prime Minister's dramatisation of Europe; 4. The press coverage of Prime Minister Blair's speech; 4.1 The British, German and French Press Coverage; 4.2 The Danish and Norwegian Reception; 4.3 Headlines and comments, descriptions and adjectives characterising the speaker and speech; 4.4 Characterisation of the rhetorical situation and direct quotes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Political rhetoric in a complex, fragmented, and mediated worldReferences; Doing politics or doing media? A linguistic approach to European parliamentary debate; 1. Introduction; 2. Background; 2.1 Parliamentary discourse; 2.2 European political discourse and the media; 2.3 The European Parliament's website: Europarl; 3. Definitions-mediated, mediatised, or simply online?; 4. Main data; 5. In the eye of the beholder - method; 6. Results; 6.1 Internet audience as addressee; 6.2 Topicalisation of the media event; 6.3 Abbreviations; 7. French specific or general phenomenon; 8. Discussion |
9. Concluding remarksReferences; Quantitative approaches to political discourse; 1. Political corpora: Multidisciplinary perspectives; 1.1 Digital corpora: A revolution in Discourse Analysis, Linguistic Studies, Corpus Linguistics, Political Discourse; 1.2 Corpora as artefacts; 2. Tools and paths to explore Europe; 2.1 Text statistics; 2.2 Corpus linguistics; 3. Conclusion; References; On what is not said and who said it; 1. Introduction; 2. Argumentative connectives; 2.1 Models of argumentative connectives; 2.2 Linguistic polyphony / ScaPoLine |
2.3 The ScaPoLine model of argumentative connectives3. Argumentative connectives in political discourse; 3.1 The contrastive connective mais; 3.2 The conclusive connective donc; 3.3 The causal connective parce que; 4. Final remarks; References; Voices and identities; 1. Introduction; 2. Theoretical and methodological approach: A modular analysis of polyphony; 2.1 The praxematical theory of dialogism; 2.2 The notion of discursive polyphony; 2.3 The Geneva model of discourse analysis; 3. Analysis: Tony Blair and Nicolas Sarkozy at the European Parliament |
3.1 Analysing linguistic markers of polyphony |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
In this chapter we take issue with the widespread view that overinterpretations and speculations are signs of weak research and tendentious treatment of data. This view is damaging to the study of political discourse as it encourages the reproduction of common sense and normalcy. In this chapter we therefore argue for the necessity of speculative readings and overinterpretations in studies of political discourse. Extreme and speculative readings of political language - readings that do too much to the data and that read too much into the texts - are crucial for the fine-grained a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |