| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA990004248660403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Di Giacomo, Salvatore <1862-1934> |
|
|
Titolo |
Gemito / Salvatore Di Giacomo ; prefazione di Giulio Carlo Argan : a cura di Michele Bonuomo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
[Napoli] : Il Mattino, stampa 198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
LIII, 161 p. : ill. ; 35 cm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Locazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collocazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Ripr. facs. dell'ed. Napoli, 1905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910964882603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Reece Helen |
|
|
Titolo |
Divorcing responsibly / / Helen Reece |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Oxford ; ; Portland, Oregon : , : Hart Publishing, , 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
9786610808465 |
9781472562807 |
1472562801 |
9781280808463 |
1280808462 |
9781847311061 |
1847311067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (272 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Divorce - Law and legislation - England |
Divorce - England |
Liberalism - England |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (pages [239]-255) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction -- 1. The Subject of Divorce -- 2. Reflecting on Divorce -- 3. Delaying Divorce -- 4. Learning from Divorce -- 5. Informing Divorce -- 6. Divorcing Responsibly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book provides an analysis of the increasing impact on the law in general and divorce law in particular of post-liberalism,which replaces choice with self-discovery. The author shows that post-liberal premises formed the foundation for every aspect of the recent divorce reform proposals. Accordingly, she attributes their failure to the contradictions inherent within post-liberalism. Nevertheless, she concludes that post-liberalism maintains a subtle yet pervasive influence on the law. Specifically, this means that we are held accountable not for what we do but for how we approach our decisions. Thus, for the first time ever, it has become possible to divorce responsibly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |