|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910964400603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Neely Mark E., Jr. |
|
|
Titolo |
The boundaries of American political culture in the Civil War era / / Mark E. Neely, Jr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Chapel Hill, N.C., : University of North Carolina Press, c2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
979-88-9313-230-4 |
979-88-908805-1-2 |
0-8078-7694-1 |
1-4696-0490-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (176 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
The Steven and Janice Brose lectures in the Civil War era |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
306.2/0973/09034 |
306.2097309034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Political culture - United States - History - 19th century |
Political participation - United States - History - 19th century |
Social classes - United States - History - 19th century |
Material culture - United States - History - 19th century |
Political clubs - United States - History - 19th century |
Minstrel shows - United States - History - 19th century |
United States Politics and government 1841-1845 |
United States Politics and government 1845-1861 |
United States Politics and government 1861-1865 |
United States Social conditions To 1865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Household gods : material culture, the home, and the boundaries of engagement with politics -- A new and profitable branch of trade : beyond the boundaries of respectability? -- A secret fund : the Union League, patriotism, and the boundaries of social class -- Minstrelsy, race, and the boundaries of American political culture. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Did preoccupations with family and work crowd out interest in politics in the nineteenth century, as some have argued? Arguing that social historians have gone too far in concluding that Americans were not deeply engaged in public life, and that political historians have gone |
|
|
|
|