|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910964255103321 |
|
|
Autore |
Hamrick William S |
|
|
Titolo |
Nature and logos : a Whiteheadian key to Merleau-Ponty's fundamental thought / / William S. Hamrick,Jan Van der Veken |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Albany, : State University of New York Press, c2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
9781438436180 |
1438436181 |
9781441696847 |
1441696849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (277 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Ontology |
Philosophy of nature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
""NATURE AND LOGOS""; ""CONTENTS""; ""ABBREVIATIONS""; ""INTRODUCTION""; ""1. NATURE AS A PHENOMENON""; ""2. FROM DUALISM TO A TWOFOLD ONTOLOGY""; ""3. THE WAY OF ALL FLESH*""; ""4. LOGOS ENDIATHETOS AND LOGOS PROFORIKOS""; ""5. THE SCHELLINGIAN AND BERGSONIAN HERITAGE""; ""6. NATURE AND LIFE""; ""7. BEYOND THE LIMITS OF PHENOMENOLOGY""; ""8. COM-PREHENDING THE FLESH""; ""CONCLUSION""; ""REFERENCES""; ""INDEX""; ""A""; ""B""; ""C""; ""D""; ""E""; ""F""; ""G""; ""H""; ""I""; ""J""; ""K""; ""L""; ""M""; ""N""; ""O""; ""P""; ""R""; ""S""; ""T""; ""U""; ""V""; ""W"" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This is the first booklength account of how Maurice Merleau-Ponty used certain texts by Alfred North Whitehead to develop an ontology based on nature, and how he could have used other Whitehead texts that he did not know in order to complete his last ontology. This account is enriched by several of Merleau-Ponty's unpublished writings not previously available in English, by the first detailed treatment of certain works by F.W.J. Schelling in the course of showing how they exerted a substantial influence on both Merleau-Ponty and Whitehead, and by the first extensive discussion of Merleau-Ponty's interest in the Stoics's notion of the twofold logos—the logos endiathetos and the |
|
|
|
|