| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA990008169320403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Archer, Margaret Scotford |
|
|
Titolo |
Structure, agency and the internal conversation / Margaret S. Archer |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cambridge : Cambridge university press, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Locazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collocazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910962721903321 |
|
|
Autore |
Hardt Michael |
|
|
Titolo |
Labor of Dionysus : a critique of the state-form / / Michael Hardt & Antonio Negri |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Minneapolis, : University of Minnesota Press, c1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (366 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Theory out of bounds ; ; 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
NegriAntonio <1933-2023.> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [332]-345) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Contents; Acknowledgments; Preface: Dionysus; Part I; Chapter 1. Communism as Critique; Chapter 2. Keynes and the Capitalist Theory of the State; Chapter 3. Labor in the Constitution; Part II; Chapter 4. Communist State Theory; Chapter 5. The State and Public Spending; Part III; Chapter 6. Postmodern Law and the Withering of Civil Society; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter 7. Potentialities of a Constituent Power; Notes; Works Cited; Index; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; R; S; T; V; W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
"Labor is the living, form-giving fire," Marx wrote. "It is the transitoriness of things, their temporality, as their transformation by living time." How is it, then, that labor, with all its life-affirming potential, has become the means of capitalist di |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |