1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910961803703321

Autore

Feyzioglu Tarhan

Titolo

Does Good Financial Performance Mean Good Financial Intermediation in China? / / Tarhan Feyzioglu

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Washington, D.C. : , : International Monetary Fund, , 2009

ISBN

9786612843839

9781462399154

1462399150

9781452704661

145270466X

9781282843837

1282843834

9781451873177

1451873174

Edizione

[1st ed.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (34 p.)

Collana

IMF Working Papers

Disciplina

332.1;332.1/532;332.1532

Soggetti

Banks and banking - China

Bank credit

Banking

Banks and Banking

Banks and banking

Banks

Commercial banks

Credit

Depository Institutions

Finance

Industries: Financial Services

Loans

Micro Finance Institutions

Monetary economics

Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit: General

Money and Monetary Policy

Mortgages

Nonperforming loans

China Economic conditions

China, People's Republic of



Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references.

Nota di contenuto

Contents; I. Introduction and Summary; II. Financial Performance of Chinese Banks; III. Bank Efficiency; A. Modeling Bank Efficiency; B. Estimation and Results; IV. Explaining Profitability; V. Conclusions; References

Sommario/riassunto

Chinese banks generate large profits and have relatively low nonperforming loans. However, good financial performance does not, in itself, guarantee that banks efficiently intermediate the economy's financial resources. This paper first examines how efficient Chinese banks are in financial intermediation, using the stochastic production frontier approach. Quality of loans are controlled for by focusing on net loans and correcting for nonperforming loans; Hong Kong SAR banks are included in the sample to have a more universally representative production frontier. The results suggest that Chinese banks indeed became more efficient during 2001-07. Nevertheless, a majority of banks remain quite inefficient, including several large state owned banks and many city banks. Large banks tend to hoard deposits and operate beyond the point of diminishing returns to scale, while smaller banks operate at increasing returns to scale. This suggests that reallocating deposits from large to smaller banks would increase overall efficiency. The paper finds no significant correlation between bank efficiency and profitability. Possible factors leading to large profits in the banking system, despite wide-spread inefficiencies, are low deposit interest rates, large interest margins, and high market concentration. Moving to indirect monetary policy and deepening capital markets to channel some of the savings to productive investment would help improve the efficiency of financial intermediation. This may spur loan growth, however, which will need to be handled with monetary policy and regulatory/supervisory tools.