|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910961675103321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Reporting district-level NAEP data : summary of a workshop / / Committee on NAEP Reporting Practices, Investigating District-Level and Market-Basket Reporting ; Pasquale J. DeVito and Judith A. Koenig, editors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Washington, D.C., : National Academy Press, c2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-309-18387-1 |
0-309-51512-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (65 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
DeVitoPasquale J |
KoenigJudith A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Educational tests and measurements - United States |
School districts - United States - Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
"Board on Testing and Assessment, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
""Front Matter""; ""Acknowledgments""; ""Contents""; ""1 Introduction""; ""2 Background""; ""3 NAEP�s Influence on State Instructional and Assessment Programs""; ""4 Comparisons with National Benchmarks: Pros and Cons""; ""5 Factors That Influence Interest In District-Level NAEP""; ""6 Summing Up: Issues to Consider and Resolve""; ""References""; ""APPENDIX A Workshop on District-Level Reporting for NAEP Agenda and Participants""; ""APPENDIX B Background Information on NAEP"" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) has earned a reputation as one of the nation's best measures of student achievement in key subject areas. Since its inception in 1969, NAEP has summarized academic performance for the nation as a whole and, beginning in 1990, for the individual states. Increasingly, NAEP results get the attention of the press, the public, and policy makers. With this increasing prominence have come calls for reporting NAEP results below the national and state levels. Some education leaders argue that NAEP can provide important and useful information to local educators and policy makers. They want NAEP to serve as a district-level indicator |
|
|
|
|