| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910960906103321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Myths and tradeoffs : the role of tests in undergraduate admissions / / Steering Committee for the Workshop on Higher Education Admissions ; Alexandra Beatty, M.R.C. Greenwood, and Robert L. Linn, editors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Washington, D.C., : National Academy Press, c1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
9780309184328 |
0309184320 |
9780309520300 |
0309520304 |
9780585085722 |
0585085722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
BeattyAlexandra S |
GreenwoodM. R. C |
LinnRobert L |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Universities and colleges - United States - Entrance examinations |
Universities and colleges - United States - Admission |
Educational tests and measurements - United States |
SAT (Educational test) |
ACT Assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
"Board on Testing and Assessment, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel, National Research Council." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 34-35). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Front Matter -- Preface -- Contents -- Executive Summary -- Context -- What Do Colleges Really Do? -- What Do Test Scores Really Mean? -- Tradeoffs -- Topics for Further Study -- References. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
More than 8 million students enrolled in 4-year, degree-granting postsecondary institutions in the United States in 1996. The multifaceted system through which these students applied to and were selected by the approximately 2,240 institutions in which they enrolled is complex, to say the least; for students, parents, and advisers, it is |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
often stressful and sometimes bewildering. This process raises important questions about the social goals that underlie the sorting of students, and it has been the subject of considerable controversy. The role of standardized tests in this sorting process has been one of the principal flashpoints in discussions of its fairness. Tests have been cited as the chief evidence of unfairness in lawsuits over admissions decisions, criticized as biased against minorities and women, and blamed for the fierce competitiveness of the process. Yet tests have also been praised for their value in providing a common yardstick for comparing students from diverse schools with different grading standards. Myths and Tradeoffs identifies and corrects some persistent myths about standardized admissions tests and highlight some of the specific tradeoffs that decisions about the uses of tests entail; presents conclusions and recommendations about the role of tests in college admissions; and lays out several issues about which information would clearly help decision makers, but about which the existing data are either insufficient or need synthesis and interpretation. This report will benefit a broad audience of college and university officials, state and other officials and lawmakers, and others who are wrestling with decisions about admissions policies, definitions of merit, legal actions, and other issues. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |