|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910956234703321 |
|
|
Autore |
Schwartz Louis Georges |
|
|
Titolo |
Mechanical witness : a history of motion picture evidence in U.S. courts / / Louis-Georges Schwartz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Oxford ; ; New York, : Oxford University Press, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-282-33559-6 |
9786612335594 |
0-19-971803-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (140 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Video tapes in court proceedings - United States |
Motion pictures - Law and legislation - United States |
Evidence, Demonstrative - United States |
Courts - United States |
Judicial process - United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Intro -- Contents -- 1 Introduction: After 100 Years of Evidentiary Film and Video -- 2 Introducing Films into the Courts: The 1920s -- 3 The Development of Case Law Governing the Use of Motion Picture Evidence in the 1940s and 1950s -- 4 Framing Videotape -- 5 The Rodney King Case, or Moving Testimony -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- K -- L -- M -- O -- P -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Mechanical Witness is the first cultural and legal history charting the changing role and theoretical implications of film and video use as courtroom evidence. Schwartz moves from the earliest employment of film in the courts of the 1920s to the notious 1991 Rodney Kind video, revealing how the courts have developed a reliance on film and video technologies and contributed to the growing influence of visual media as a dominant mode of knowledge formation. At the same time, film and video in juridical contexts has developed a distinct theoretical legacy. The particular qualities of film as evidence both resonate with and contradict existing scholarship-focusing on economic, social, or |
|
|
|
|