| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910900174503321 |
|
|
Autore |
Matić Uros |
|
|
Titolo |
Gender Trouble and Current Archaeological Debates |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cham : , : Springer International Publishing AG, , 2024 |
|
©2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (172 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Themes in Contemporary Archaeology Series |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
GaydarskaBisserka |
ColtofeanLaura |
Díaz-GuardaminoMarta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Intro -- Preface -- Contents -- Editors and Contributors -- About the Editors -- Contributors -- 1: Let's Talk About Gender-The Place of Gender in Current Archaeological Debates -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 Where Are We Now?-The Current State of Gender Archaeology -- 1.3 Gender Trouble and Current Archaeological Debates -- 1.4 Gender Archaeology in Current Global Tensions and Online Trends -- 1.5 Conclusions -- References -- Part I: New Methods, Theories and Approaches -- 2: Sex, Gender and the Third Science Revolution -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 Identifying Sex -- 2.2.1 Via Bone Morphology -- 2.2.2 Via Ancient DNA -- 2.2.3 Via Sex-Specific Peptides -- 2.3 Linking Sex and Gender -- 2.4 Gendered Lifeways: Labour Division and Diet -- 2.5 Kinship -- 2.6 Mobility and Migration -- 2.7 Conclusion -- References -- 3: Mapping Collaborations: Working in the Contact Zone of Posthumanism and Gender Archaeology -- 3.1 Gender in the Theoretical Contact Zone: Introduction -- 3.2 Contested Humanities: Posthumanism and/as/Against Gender Archaeology -- 3.2.1 Is Archaeology the Study of Human Beings? -- 3.2.2 Is "Human" a Gendered Concept? -- 3.2.3 What Does Gender Look Like in Archaeological Terms? -- 3.3 Mapping Multiplicities -- 3.3.1 Multiplicity -- 3.3.2 Mapping -- 3.4 Mapping Gendered Worlds: A Precarious Life in Tenth Century Northern Europe -- 3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusions: Gender Archaeologies Multiple -- References -- Primary Sources -- 4: Gender in Digital Archaeology in Europe and North America -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 What Is Digital Archaeology? -- 4.3 Who Makes Digital Archaeology? -- 4.4 Theorising Digital Archaeology and Data Biases -- 4.5 Locating Gender in Digital Archaeology -- 4.6 The Feminist Critique: Engendering Digital Archaeology -- 4.7 Conclusions -- References -- Part II: Studying Aspects of Gender in the Past. |
5: Intersectionality and Gender in Archaeology -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 Defining Intersectionality -- 5.3 Intersectionality in Archaeology: Challenges -- 5.4 Intersectionality in Archaeological Inquiry -- 5.5 Knowledge Production and Activism -- 5.6 What About Gender? -- 5.7 Conclusions -- References -- 6: Gender and Social Inequality -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Theorising Gender Inequality -- 6.3 Archaeological Approaches to Gender Inequality -- 6.4 Future Perspectives -- 6.4.1 Broadening Models of Gender Inequality -- 6.4.2 Archeological Implications: Methodology and Interpretation -- 6.5 Conclusion -- References -- 7: Gender and Violence in Archaeology -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Gender of Violence -- 7.3 Warrior Women -- 7.4 Gender as Symbolic and Structural Violence -- 7.5 Sexual Violence -- 7.6 Gender as a Frame of War -- 7.7 Violence and Coloniality of Gender -- 7.8 Conclusion -- References -- 8: One Step Further: Reflections on Gendered Mobility Studies Through an Examination of Recent Data from European Prehistory -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 Background -- 8.3 Methods for Pulling Apart Sex, Gender and Movement -- 8.3.1 Sexually Dimorphic Changes Brought About by Sustained Movement -- 8.3.2 aDNA -- 8.3.3 Isotopic Studies Help Determine Different Kinds of Mobility -- 8.4 Discussion -- 8.4.1 Were They Really Marriages as Such? -- 8.4.2 Alternative Viewpoints on Children's Mobility -- 8.4.3 What About Bridenapping? -- 8.4.4 Gender Is Not Binary -- Mobility Is Not Either -- 8.5 Conclusion -- References -- Part III: Communicating Gender -- 9: Gender Education in Archaeology -- 9.1 Introduction -- 9.2 United Kingdom -- 9.2.1 Data Collection -- 9.2.2 Results -- 9.3 Germany -- 9.3.1 Data Collection -- 9.3.2 Results -- 9.4 Bulgaria -- 9.4.1 Data Collection -- 9.4.2 Results -- 9.5 Lessons to Be Learnt. |
9.6 Why Does It Matter? -- 9.7 Conclusion -- References -- 10: Trapped in Time: Gender Representation in Archaeological Museum Exhibitions in Europe -- 10.1 Introduction -- 10.2 Gender and the Frameworks in Which Museums Operate -- 10.3 Gender Representation in Permanent Archaeological Exhibitions in Europe -- 10.4 Gender Representation in Temporary Archaeological Exhibitions in Europe -- 10.5 Case Study: The National Archaeological Museum in Portugal -- 10.5.1 Women in the Professional Structures of the MNA -- 10.5.2 Women's Representation in the Exhibitions of the MNA -- 10.6 Bridging a Communication Gap: Gender Research in Academia and Museums -- 10.7 Conclusion -- References -- 11: Coda: "Oh, the Places We'll Go": Reflections on Engendered Archaeology Moving Forward -- 11.1 Part I: Some Comments on an Engendering Process or, How to Impact-Even Change?-A Discipline -- 11.2 Part II: What Is the Matter with Theory in Archaeology These Days? -- References -- Archaeological Sites, Places and Geographical Regions Index -- Personal Names (Modern) Index -- Institutions Index -- Personal Names and Adjectives Index -- Concepts Index. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |