| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910898657503321 |
|
|
Autore |
Gajewska Grażyna |
|
|
Titolo |
Ekofantastyka : Ujęcie sympojetyczne / Grażyna Gajewska |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Poznań [Poland], : Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Adama Mickiewicza, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (1 p. 260) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Language and Literature Studies |
Speculative fiction |
Climatic changes in literature |
Studies of Literature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The future, in which future generations of both human and non-human beings will live, is being shaped today, and it is in this sense that we experience it, conceptualize it to some extent, model it, and feel it emotionally and even somatically. The author of Ecofiction talks about this way of experiencing the present and future in the context of the climate crisis, water and air pollution, disappearing biodiversity, and worsening environmental injustice. The book contains the thesis that to change this state of affairs we need not only scientific, technological, political and economic tools, but also some new sensibility and aesthetics. The "management of imagination" Gajewska proposes would mean constructing new models of cognition at both the epistemological, ontological, axiological and aesthetic levels. The book also constitutes a search for such types, genres, genre varieties in literature, film, computer games, fine arts in which various scenarios of human-not-human justice (or injustice) are most clearly revealed. It makes a case for paying special attention to speculative science fiction, in which the themes of ecology and multispecies (in)justice are addressed. Engaged in presenting alternative images of reality, this trend in speculative fiction provokes audiences to rethink the place of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
humans on Earth, our relationship with non-humans and political-ethical-aesthetic responsibility for the possible (or probable) shape of the future. At the same time, these speculations – as products of the times in which they were conceived – reveal the ideas that present-day writers, filmmakers, artists and audiences of their works about the likely, or expected, direction in which we will (perhaps) move to transcend, or at least weaken, anthropocentric thinking and direct attention to biodiversity and multispecies well-being. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910220060003321 |
|
|
Autore |
Fernanda Tovar-Moll |
|
|
Titolo |
How Can Development and Plasticity Contribute to Understanding Evolution of the Human Brain? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (130 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Frontiers Research Topics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Humans usually attribute themselves the prerogative of being the pinnacle of evolution. They have large brains with many billion neurons and glial cells, trillions of synapses and besides all, a plastic hardware that may change either subtly or strongly in response to the external environment and internal, mental commands. With this hypercomplex apparatus, they are capable of very sophisticated inward computations and outward behaviors that include self-recognition, metacognition, different forms of language expression and reception, prediction of future events, planning and performing long streams of motor acts, subtle emotional feelings, and many other surprising, almost unbelievable properties. The main challenge for research is: how do we explain this gigantic achievement of evolution? Is it a direct consequence of having acquired a brain larger than our primate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ancestors, with huge numbers of computational units? Would it be determined by a particular way these units came to relate to each other, building up logic circuits of powerful capacities? What along development has "made the difference" for the construction of such a complex brain machine? How much of this complexity is innate, how much is sculpted by influence of the external world, by social interaction with our human fellows, and by the history of our own mental trajectory along life? Many specific questions can be asked (albeit not necessarily answered so far) to this purpose: (1) which genomic characteristics make us unique among primates? (2) which of developmental events during and beyond embryogenesis define our brain - prolonged neurogenesis? permanent circuit (re)formation? dynamic synaptogenesis? regressive sculpting of the hardware? all of them? (3) is there anything special about plasticity of the human brain that allows us to build the exquisite individual variability characteristic of our brains? Neuroscience is in need of a synthesis. Perhaps associating concepts derived from developmental neurobiology with evolutionary morphology and physiology, together with those that photograph the human brain in action under influence of the external world, would turn on a light at the end of the tunnel, and we would be able to understand what humans do have that is special - if anything - to explain our success in the Earth. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |