6.2 The Roots of Medieval consequentiae in Hypothetical Syllogistic and Topical Argument -- 6.2.1 Maximal Propositions as Grounds of Consequence -- 6.2.2 Boethian Topical Theory as Ground of Hypothetical Syllogistic -- 6.2.3 The Limits of Boethius' Grounding of Consequence -- 6.3 Medieval Consequence and the Theory of Supposition -- 6.3.1 Canonical Supposition Theory: Ockham and Buridan -- 6.3.2 Supposition Theory in Two Early British De consequentiis -- 6.3.3 An Alternate Reading of Personal Supposition in the Parisian De consequentiis -- 6.3.4 Supposition in Burley's De puritate artis logicae -- 6.4 Conclusion -- Works Cited -- Medieval Sources -- Modern Sources -- Chapter 7: Thomas Aquinas, Henry of Ghent, and John Duns Scotus on the Causation of Proper and Inseparable Accidents -- 7.1 Proper, Inseparable, and Essential Features -- 7.2 Logicians and the propria -- 7.3 The Causal Approach -- 7.4 The Self-Agency View: Henry of Ghent -- 7.5 Self-Agency Defended Again: John Duns Scotus against Godfrey of Fontaines -- 7.6 Conclusion -- Works Cited -- Ancient and Medieval Sources -- Modern Sources -- Chapter 8: Ockham on Priority and Posteriority -- 8.1 The Texts -- 8.2 Stock Types and Stock Examples -- 8.3 Two Ways to Be Ordered -- 8.4 Extrinsic Ordering -- 8.5 Priority in Time or Place -- 8.6 Simultaneity in Time or Place -- 8.7 Causal and Natural Priority -- 8.8 Necessary and Necessarily Co-extensive Items -- 8.9 Natural Priority and Time -- 8.10 Separable Items -- 8.11 Natural Priority in Nature -- 8.12 An Underspecified Example -- 8.13 Priority vs. Dependence -- 8.14 Other Notions of Natural Priority -- 8.15 Conclusion -- Works Cited -- Medieval Sources -- Secondary Literature -- Chapter 9: William of Ockham on Essential Dependence and Causation -- 9.1 An Essential Dependence Theory of Causation -- 9.1.1 Regularity Rules. |