|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910830978303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Fiorentini Luca <1976-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Bow-tie industrial risk management across sectors : a barrier based approach / / Luca Fiorentini |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Hoboken, New Jersey : , : Wiley, , [2022] |
|
©2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-119-52367-2 |
1-119-52382-6 |
1-119-52385-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (481 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Cover -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Contents -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Preface 1 -- Preface 2 -- Preface 3 -- Preface 4 -- Preface 5 -- Preface 6 -- Preface 7 -- Preface 8 -- Author Preface -- Acknowledgements -- Chapter 1 Introduction to Risk and Risk Management -- 1.1 Risk Is Everywhere, and Risk Management Became a Critical Issue in Several Sectors -- 1.2 ISO 31000 Standard -- 1.2.1 The Principles of RM -- 1.3 ISO 31000 Risk Management Workflow -- 1.3.1 Leadership and Commitment -- 1.3.2 Understanding the Organization and Its Context -- 1.3.3 Implementation of the RM Framework -- 1.3.4 The Risk Management Process -- 1.3.5 Relationship between the RM Principles, Framework, and Process -- 1.3.6 Evaluating and Improving the RM Framework -- 1.3.7 The Risk Assessment Phase -- 1.3.8 Risk Identification -- 1.3.9 Risk Analysis -- 1.3.10 Analysis of Control Barriers -- 1.3.11 Consequences Analysis -- 1.3.12 Frequency Analysis and Probability Estimation -- 1.3.13 Preliminary Analysis -- 1.3.14 Uncertainty and Sensitivity of the Analysis -- 1.3.15 Risk Evaluation -- 1.3.16 Acceptability and Tolerability Criteria of the Risk -- 1.3.17 The Risk Matrix -- 1.3.18 The ALARP Study -- 1.3.19 Risk Management over Time -- 1.3.20 Risk Treatment -- 1.3.21 Monitoring and Review -- 1.3.22 Audit Activities -- 1.3.23 The System Performance Review -- 1.4 Uncertainty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and the Human Factor -- 1.4.1 Performance-Shaping Factors -- 1.5 Enterprise Complexity and (Advanced) Risk Management (ERM) -- 1.6 Proactive and Reactive Culture of Organizations Dealing with Risk Management -- 1.6.1 Risk Management between Fulfilment and Opportunity -- 1.6.2 Quality of Risk Management -- 1.6.3 The Pathological Condition -- 1.6.4 The Reactive Condition -- 1.6.5 The Bureaucratic Condition -- 1.6.6 The Proactive Condition -- 1.6.7 The Generative Condition. |
1.7 A Systems Approach to Risk Management -- 1.7.1 ISO 9001 (Quality) / ISO 45001 (Occupational health and safety) / ISO 14001 (Environment) -- 1.7.2 Industrial Safety (Major Accidents) -- 1.7.3 Functional Safety and RAGAGEP Standards -- 1.7.4 ISO 55000 (Asset Management and Integrity) -- 1.7.5 ISO 22301 (Business Continuity) -- 1.7.6 ISO IEC 27001 (Information Security) -- 1.7.7 ISO 19011 (Audit) -- 1.7.8 ISO 39001 (Road Traffic Safety) -- 1.7.9 ISO 19600 (Compliance Management Systems) -- Chapter 2 Bow-Tie Model -- 2.1 Hazards and Risks -- 2.2 Methods of Risk Management -- 2.2.1 Risk Identification -- 2.2.2 Risk Analysis -- 2.2.3 Barrier-Based Methods -- 2.2.4 Risk Evaluation -- 2.3 The Bow-Tie Method -- 2.4 The Bow-Tie Method and the Risk Management Workflow from ISO 31000 -- 2.5 Application of Bow-Ties -- Project: Disposal of a Data Center -- 2.6 Level of Abstraction -- 2.7 Building a Bow-Tie -- 2.8 Hazards -- 2.9 Top Events -- 2.10 Threats -- 2.11 Consequences -- 2.12 Barriers -- 2.12.1 Primary Barriers -- 2.13 Escalation Factors and Associated Barriers -- 2.13.1 Secondary Barriers -- 2.14 Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA): A Quantified Bow-Tie to Measure Risks -- 2.14.1 How to Build a LOPA Assessment -- 2.14.2 AIChE CCPS Guidelines -- 2.14.3 Conditional Modifiers and Enabling Factors -- 2.15 Bow-Tie as a Quantitative Method to Measure Risks and Develop a Dynamic Quantified Risk Register -- 2.15.1 LOPA Analysis in Bow-Tie -- 2.16 Advanced Bow-Ties: Chaining and Combination -- Chapter 3 Barrier Failure Analysis -- 3.1 Accidents, Near-Misses, and Non-Conformities in Risk Management -- 3.2 The Importance of Operational Experience -- 3.3 Principles of Accident Investigation -- 3.4 The Barrier Failure Analysis (BFA) -- 3.4.1 Event -- 3.4.2 Timeline -- 3.4.3 Barriers -- 3.4.4 Causation Path and Multi-Level Causes. |
3.5 From Root Cause Analysis (RCA) to BFA -- 3.5.1 Introduction to RCA -- 3.6 BFA from Bow-Ties -- Chapter 4 Workflows and Case Studies -- 4.1 Bow-Tie Construction Workflow with a Step-by-Step Guide -- 4.1.1 Case Study Anatomy -- 4.1.2 Case Study Taxonomy -- 4.1.3 Acceptability Criteria -- 4.1.4 Definition of Risk Matrices -- 4.1.5 Diagram Construction -- 4.1.6 Versioning Activities and Track Changes -- 4.1.7 Terminology -- 4.1.8 Using Colors -- 4.1.9 Attach Documentation -- 4.1.10 Definition of Organizational Structure and Responsible Stakeholders -- 4.1.11 Defining Tasks -- 4.1.12 LOPA Analysis -- 4.1.13 Other Data -- 4.1.14 Extraction of Critical Barriers and Performance Standard Register -- 4.1.15 Bow-Tie Audit Activity -- 4.1.16 Work Organizational Schemes for Multi-Site Operations -- 4.2 LOPA Construction Workflow with a Step-by-Step Guide -- 4.2.1 Identification of Objectives -- 4.2.2 Identify the Consequence to Screen the Scenarios -- 4.2.3 Select an Accident Scenario -- 4.2.4 Identify the Initiating Event of the Scenario and Determine the Initiating Event Frequency -- 4.2.5 Identify the Independent Protection Layers -- 4.2.6 Characterize the IPLs in Terms of Probability of Failure on Demand -- 4.2.7 Estimate the Risk -- 4.2.8 Evaluate the Risk and Make Risk-Based Decisions -- 4.2.9 Consideration of Results -- 4.3 BFA Construction Workflow with a Step-by-Step Guide -- 4.3.1 Fact-Finding -- 4.3.2 Event Chaining -- 4.3.3 Identifying Barriers -- 4.3.4 Assessing Barrier |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State -- 4.3.5 Causation Analysis and Categories -- 4.3.6 Recommendations -- 4.3.7 Reporting -- 4.4 Worked Examples -- 4.4.1 Local Reduction of the Resisting Capacity of a Bridge due to Ageing - Bow-Tie Risk Assessment -- 4.4.2 COVID-19 infection - Bow-Tie Risk Assessment -- 4.4.3 Fire in Flight - Bow-Tie Risk Assessment -- 4.4.4 Food Contamination - Barrier Failure Analysis. |
4.4.5 Web-Based Software Development - Bow-Tie Risk Assessment -- 4.4.6 IT Operations - Bow-Tie Risk Assessment -- 4.4.7 Crowding Bow-Tie Risk Assessment -- 4.4.8 Military Helicopter Operations Bow-Tie Risk Assessment -- 4.4.9 Patient Safety Bow-Ties -- 4.4.10 Process Safety Bow-Tie -- 4.4.11 Famous Process Industry Incidents Analyzed with BFA -- 4.4.12 Drug Administration Bow-Ties -- 4.4.13 ThyssenKrupp Fire Investigation and Bow-Tie -- 4.4.14 Twente Stadium Roof Collapse Tripod Beta Analysis -- 4.4.15 Water Treatment Bow-Tie Analysis -- 4.4.16 Operational Experience Analysis Using BFA -- 4.4.17 Fire Risk Assessment for Companies Managing Multiple Assets -- 4.4.18 Fire Risk Assessment for Companies Managing Multiple PV Plants -- Conclusions -- Appendix 1 Bow-Tie Easy Guide -- Appendix 2 BFA Easy Guide -- Appendix 3 Human Error and Reliability Assessment (HRA) -- Human Errors and Violations -- The Rasmussen Skills-Rules-Knowledge Model of Human Error -- Slips and Lapses -- Mistakes -- Violations -- Reducing the Risk of Human Error -- References and Further Reading -- Index -- EULA. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
"As stated by ISO 31000 "organizations of all types and sizes face internal and external factors and influences that make it uncertain whether and when they will achieve their objectives. The effect this uncertainty has on organization's objectives is a risk. All activities of an organization involve risk". ISO, together with the International Trade Centre and the United Nations Industrial Development Organization published a specific guide about the importance of the implementation of sound risk management practices in small and mid enterprises. Risk management is an integral part of all organizational processes and of decision making. It should be systematic, structured and timely. It also should be based on the best available information and tailored. It should consider human and cultural factors ("soft" factors) together with technical and organizational factors ("hard" factors)."-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |