|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910830870803321 |
|
|
Autore |
Steinbach Jörg |
|
|
Titolo |
Safety assessment for chemical processes [[electronic resource] /] / Jörg Steinbach |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Weinheim ; ; New York, : Wiley-VCH, c1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-281-76381-0 |
9786611763817 |
3-527-61176-2 |
3-527-61175-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (321 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Chemical plants - Safety measures |
Chemical engineering - Safety measures |
Hazardous substances - Safety measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [295]-299) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Safety Assessment for Chemical Processes; Contents; 1 Basic Terminology in Loss Prevention; 1.1 General Safety Terms; 1.1.1 Hazard Potential and Expectable Damage; 1.1.2 Risk; 1.2 Basic Terminology for Plant/Process Operation; 2 Procedure for Process Safety Investigations; 2.1 Scope of Investigation in its Dependence on the Process Development Stage; 2.2 Definition of Significant Plant or Process Modifications; 2.3 Types of investigations Corresponding to the Life Cycle Progress; 3 Test Methods For The Thermal Stability Assessment Of Substances And Mixtures |
3.1 Theoretical Considerations For Laboratory Processes3.2 Screening -Methods For kg-Scale Processes; 3.2.1 Difference Thermal Analysis (DTA) and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC); 3.2.2 The Carius Tube Test; 3.2.3 The Miniautoclave Test; 3.2.4 Open Cup Measuring Techniques; 3.3 Further Basic Assessment Test Methods For kg-Scale Processes; 3.3.1 The Burning Test For Solids; 3.3.2 Test On The Ignitability Of Solids; 3.3.3 Flash-point of Liquids; 3.3.4 Ignition Temperature of Liquids; 3.4 Partial Testing for Explosion Risk; 3.5 |
|
|
|
|