1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910829190903321

Autore

Dibadj Reza R. <1970->

Titolo

Rescuing regulation [[electronic resource] /] / Reza R. Dibadj

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Albany, NY, : State University of New York Press, c2006

ISBN

0-7914-8109-3

1-4294-1364-6

Edizione

[1st ed.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (238 p.)

Disciplina

343/.07

Soggetti

Police power - Philosophy

Industrial laws and legislation

Industrial laws and legislation - Social aspects

Trade regulation

Trade regulation - Social aspects

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references (p. 181-209) and index.

Nota di contenuto

Traditional perspectives -- Lambasting regulation -- Where is society left? -- Beyond flawed assumptions -- Toward new research -- Substantive reform -- Institutional changes.

Sommario/riassunto

The traditional debate on governmental regulation has run its course, with economically minded analysts pointing to regulation's inefficiency while those focused on justice purposefully avoid the economic paradigm to defend regulation's role in protecting consumers, workers, and society's disadvantaged. In Rescuing Regulation, Reza R. Dibadj challenges both camps. He squarely addresses the shortcomings of the conventional economic critique that portrays regulation as a waste, and also confronts those focused on justice to marshal economic arguments for public intervention against social inequities and abusive market behavior. Providing novel answers to the questions of why and how to regulate, Dibadj contends that the law and economics paradigm must not remain an apologist for laissez-faire public policy. He also demonstrates how incorporating the latest economics and revamping institutions can help improve our public agencies. Rescuing Regulation not only suggests ways to develop public institutions reflective of a democracy, but also broadly outlines how social science can inform



normative legal discourse.