| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910828562303321 |
|
|
Autore |
VandenBussche Christopher J. |
|
|
Titolo |
Cytopathology case reviews / / Christopher J. VandenBussche and Syed Z. Ali ; acquisitions editor, Rich Winters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York, New York : , : Demos Medical, , 2015 |
|
©2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (271 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Cytodiagnosis |
Pathology, Cellular |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and indexes at the end of each chapters. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Cover; Title; Copyright; Contents; Foreword; Preface; Share Cytopathology Case Review; Case 1: Fluid Pericardium; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion; b. Hodgkin Lymphoma; References; Case 2: FNA Thyroid; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion; b. Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma; References; Case 3: Pap test Cervix; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion; e. ASC-US and AGC; References; Case 4: Fluid Abdomen; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion |
b. Pleomorphic RhabdomyosarcomaReference; Case 5: FNA Lymph node; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion; e. Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma; Reference; Case 6: FNA Breast; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion; d. Ductal Carcinoma With Mucinous Features; References; Case 7: Urine Bladder; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion; a. Carcinoma With Extensive Squamous Differentiation; References; Case 8: FNA Lung; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion |
b. Metastatic Malignant MelanomaReferences; Case 9: FNA Liver; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion; e. Poorly Differentiated Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference; Case 10: FNA Pleura; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion; c. Malignant Mesothelioma; Reference; Case 11: FNA Bone; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion; b. Large Cell Lymphoma; References; Case 12: Pap test Cervix; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion |
a. Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the CervixReference; Case 13: FNA Stomach; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion; b. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST); Reference; Case 14: FNA Pancreas; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion; a. Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor (PanNET); Reference; Case 15: FNA Soft tissue; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion; b. Ulcerating Tuberculous Infection (Scrofula); References; Case 16: FNA Salivary; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis |
Answer and Brief Discussionc. Pleomorphic Adenoma; References; Case 17: FNA Liver; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion; d. Consistent With Focal Nodular Hyperplasia; References; Case 18: FNA Thyroid; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion; c. Consistent With Graves' Disease; References; Case 19: FNA Soft tissue; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion; d. Schwannoma; References; Case 20: FNA Salivary; Clinical History; Choose the Best Diagnosis; Answer and Brief Discussion |
d. Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma (MEC), High Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Pathology residents, fellows, and practitioners will welcome this cytopathology review of carefully selected case scenarios drawn from the Johns Hopkins case archive. Each illustrated case scenario contains multiple-choice questions along with detailed explanations and references. Authored by distinguished faculty at Johns Hopkins University, the helpful review covers all major topics within cytopathology. Each clinical case scenario includes representative images and clinical history, diagnostic question, and detailed discussion supported by thoughtfully selected key references. Cases are pres |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |