|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910828006703321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Active learning spaces / / Paul Baepler, D. Christopher Brooks, J. D. Walker, editors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
San Francisco, California : , : Jossey-Bass, , 2014 |
|
©2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-118-87028-X |
1-118-87019-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (114 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
New Directions for Teaching and Learning, , 1536-0768 ; ; Number 137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Active learning - Study and teaching (Higher) |
Active learning - United States |
Education, Higher - Effect of technological innovations on |
Educational technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Active Learning Spaces; CONTENTS; FROM THE SERIES EDITOR; EDITORS' NOTES; Literature Review; Acknowledgments; References; 1 History and Evolution of Active Learning Spaces; Why Should Learning Spaces Change?; The World Is Different; Information Is Readily Accessible; Students Are Different; So Why Are Lecture Halls So Common?; Change Arrives Slowly; Active Learning in Labs; Active Learning in Lectures; History of Studios; Active Learning in Studios; Future of Active Learning Classrooms; 2 Using Qualitative Research to Assess Teaching and Learning in Technology-Infused TILE Classrooms |
IntroductionResearch Methods; The Need for a Better Environment for Student-Centered Learning Activities; Faculty Development for TILE Instructors; The Challenges Instructors Face in TILE Classrooms; Conclusion and Implications; References; 3 Active Learning Classrooms and Educational Alliances: Changing Relationships to Improve Learning; Introduction; Data and Methods; Findings; Dimension 1: Mutual Respect; Dimension 2: Shared Responsibility for Learning; Dimension 3: Effective Communication and Feedback; Dimension 4: Cooperation; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimension 5: Trust and Security; Conclusion; Note; References |
4 Coffeehouse as Classroom: Examination of a New Style of Active Learning EnvironmentWhy We Conducted the Study; Method; Participants; Instrument and Data Collection Description; Key Findings; Faculty and Students Overwhelmingly Felt That the Space Was Conducive to Collaboration.; Design of the Room and Furniture Received Mixed Reviews from Faculty and Students; Faculty and Students Rated the Space Very Positively with Respect to the Comfort and Overall Feel of the Classroom; With the Exception of the Projector, the Technology in the Room Was Not Used to Significant Effect |
Faculty DevelopmentSummary and Key Takeaways; References; 5 Pedagogy Matters, Too: The Impact of Adapting Teaching Approaches to Formal Learning Environments on Student Learning; Introduction; Literature Review; Data; Analysis; Conclusion; Note; References; 6 Strategies to Address Common Challenges When Teaching in an Active Learning Classroom; Differences between ALCs and Traditional Classrooms; Challenges Imposed by the Physical Layout of the Room; No Focal Point; Multiple Distractions; Overwhelming Technology; Challenges Imposed by Changes in Teaching Roles |
The Instructor Is No Longer the Focal PointStudents Can't Hide; Loss of Wider Community; Methods for Using Student Feedback to Address Challenges; References; 7 Conducting an Introductory Biology Course in an Active Learning Classroom: A Case Study of an Experienced Faculty Member; Study Overview; Results; Pedagogical Practices; Insights; Discussion; References; 8 TILE at Iowa: Adoption and Adaptation; Introduction; Laying the Groundwork; Departmental Buy-In; Shifting Perspectives and Remaining Questions; Notes; References |
9 Active Learning Environments in Nursing Education: The Experience of the University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
With the paradigm shift to student-centered learning, the physical teaching space is being examined The configuration of classrooms, the technology within them, and the behaviors they encourage are frequently represented as a barrier to enacting student-centered teaching methods, because traditionally designed rooms typically lack flexibility in seating arrangement, are configured to privilege a speaker at the front of the room, and lack technology to facilitate student collaboration. But many colleges and universities are redesigning the spaces in which students learn, collapsing tra |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |