1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910827833703321

Autore

Roberts Patrick S. <1975->

Titolo

Disasters and the American state : how politicians, bureaucrats, and the public prepare for the unexpected / / Patrick S. Roberts, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2013

ISBN

1-107-24148-0

1-107-25103-6

1-107-24937-6

1-107-25020-X

1-107-24854-X

1-107-24771-3

1-139-19887-4

Edizione

[1st ed.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (ix, 224 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)

Disciplina

363.34/70973

Soggetti

Disaster relief - Government policy - United States

Emergency management - Government policy - United States

Civil defense - United States

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 08 Oct 2015).

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

From disaster relief to disaster management -- The origins of the disaster state, 1789-1914 -- Civil defense and the foundations of disaster policy, 1914-1979 -- The rise of emergency management and FEMA, 1979-2001 -- Terrorism and the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, 1993-2003 -- "Where the hell is the army?": Hurricane Katrina meets the homeland security era -- Administrative evil and elite panic in disaster management -- Disasters and the American state.

Sommario/riassunto

Disasters and the American State offers a thesis about the trajectory of federal government involvement in preparing for disaster shaped by contingent events. Politicians and bureaucrats claim credit for the government's successes in preparing for and responding to disaster, and they are also blamed for failures outside of government's control.



New interventions have created precedents and established organizations and administrative cultures that accumulated over time and produced a general trend in which citizens, politicians and bureaucrats expect the government to provide more security from more kinds of disasters. The trend reached its peak when the Federal Emergency Management Agency adopted the idea of preparing for 'all hazards' as its mantra. Despite the rhetoric, however, the federal government's increasingly bold claims and heightened public expectations are disproportionate to the ability of the federal government to prevent or reduce the damage caused by disaster.