|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910827515803321 |
|
|
Autore |
Crossley James G |
|
|
Titolo |
The date of Mark's Gospel : insight from the law in earliest Christianity / / James G. Crossley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
London ; ; New York, : T & T Clark International, c2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-283-20119-4 |
9786613201195 |
0-567-61603-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (265 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Journal for the study of the New Testament. Supplement series ; ; 266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Jewish law - Biblical teaching |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Revision of author's thesis (Ph. D)--University of Nottingham. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Cover; Editorial Board; Title; Copyright; Dedication; CONTENTS; Acknowledgements; List of Abbreviations; INTRODUCTION; Chapter 1 THE EXTERNAL EVIDENCE; Chapter 2 MARK 13; Chapter 3 THE DATE OF MARK AND MODERN GOSPEL CRITICISM; Chapter 4 JESUS' TORAH OBSERVANCE IN THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS; Chapter 5 THE TORAH AND EARLIEST CHRISTIANITY; Chapter 6 DATING MARK LEGALLY (I): 2 TEST CASES (MK 2.23-28; MK 10.2-12); Chapter 7 DATING MARK LEGALLY(II): MARK 7.1-23; CONCLUSIONS; Bibliography; Index of References; Index of Authors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book argues that MarkGÇÖs gospel was not written as late as c. 65GÇô75 CE, but dates from sometime between the late 30s and early 40s CE. It challenges the use of the external evidence (such as Irenaeus and Clement of Alexandria) often used for dating Mark, relying instead on internal evidence from the gospel itself. James Crossley also questions the view that Mark 13 reflects the Jewish war, arguing that there are other plausible historical settings.Crossley argues that MarkGÇÖs gospel takes for granted that Jesus fully observed biblical law and that Mark could only make such an assumpti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|