|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910827365603321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Studies in law, politics, and society . Vol. 61 / / edited by Austin Sarat |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Bingley, United Kingdom, : Emerald, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (210 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Studies in law, politics, and society, , 1059-4337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Social Science - Anthropology - Cultural |
Cultural studies |
Sociological jurisprudence |
Political sociology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Redefining the abduction of children : legal truth in post-dictatorial Argentine courts of law/ Natacha V. Osenda -- Legal framing / Gwendolyn Leachman -- The silent defendant : some thoughts on law and film / Yofi Tirosh -- A modern trial : a study of the use of video-recorded testimonies in the swedish Court of appeal / Leif Dahlberg -- "Its the network" : the federalist society as a supplier of intellectual capital for the supreme court / Amanda Hollis-Brusky -- The supreme court : an autobiography / Keith J. Bybee, Angela G. Narasimhan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This volume of Studies in law, politics and society brings together an international spread of legal scholars, presenting a varied collection of chapters. Chapters include: child abduction during the military dictatorship in Argentina; a novel approach to empirical research on legal framing from the University of California, Berkeley; the role of silence in law and film from Israel; a chapter from Sweden on the use of video in the court of appeal; and finally two chapters on the supreme court in the USA, one looking at influences through social capital on supreme court decision makers and the second looking at the self-perception and public perception of the supreme court. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|