1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910827096203321

Autore

Meireles Selma Martins

Titolo

Dissension and face-work strategies in German dialogues / / Selma Martins Meireles

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Tübingen, Germany : , : Max Niemeyer Verlag, , 2002

©2002

ISBN

3-11-091863-3

Edizione

[Reprint 2015]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (197 p.)

Collana

Linguistische Arbeiten, , 0344-6727 ; ; 457

Classificazione

GC 5210

Disciplina

430.141

Soggetti

German language - Honorific

German language - Spoken German

Dialogue analysis

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references.

Nota di contenuto

Front matter -- Contents -- Introduction -- 1. Theoretical base -- 2. Methodology -- 3. Occurrences analyses and discussion -- 4. Dissension off-record -- 5. Direct Dissension -- 6. Direct Dissension with positive redress -- 7. Direct Dissension with Negative Redress -- 8. Interpretation of the Results -- 9. Final considerations -- 10. Appendix -- Bibliography

Sommario/riassunto

Dissension in German discussions and the Face-work strategies (Goffman 1967, 1986; Brown/Levinson, 1978, 1987) used for expressing them are identified and analyzed in the study. Dissension, defined as a propositional attitude of the speaker's disagreement is deemed to be highly threatening to the social image of an individual and is to be uttered using specific Face-work strategies and/or a higher degree of redress for the social image. After a discussion of the concepts 'Dissension' and 'Face-work', the corpus and methodology, the results of an analysis of about eight hours of recorded conversation and about 370 occurrences of Dissension are presented. According to their scope, they were classified into four categories, which proved relevant for the set of 38 Face-work strategies found to express them, as well as the elements employed in their linguistic expression. No specific linguistic means for expressing Dissension was found,



although most cases display semantically negative lexical components. Linguistic elements from many word classes as well as devices such as Deixis manipulation were used for Face-work. The results are also interpreted in regard to the relationship between Dissension, its different categories and the several strategies used to express them. An appendix presents all occurrences of Dissension found in the corpus as well as a detailed examination of their categories and linguistic forms, Face-work strategies and linguistic means used to convey them.