| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910826839303321 |
|
|
Autore |
O'Connor Michael <1963-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Cajetan's biblical commentaries : motive and method / / by Michael O'Connor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Leiden ; ; Boston : , : Brill, , [2017] |
|
©2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (318 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
St Andrews studies in reformation history, , 2468-4317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Front Matter / Michael O’Connor -- Introduction / Michael O’Connor -- Friar, Professor, Papal Courtier (1469–1512) / Michael O’Connor -- Prelate, Diplomat, Biblical Scholar (1513–1534) / Michael O’Connor -- The Bible and Reform / Michael O’Connor -- Error, Schism, and Heresy / Michael O’Connor -- Correcting the Latin Text / Michael O’Connor -- Cajetan’s Literal Sense: Words, Context, Style / Michael O’Connor -- Cajetan’s Literal Sense: The Harmony and Sufficiency of Scripture / Michael O’Connor -- ‘Applauded Neither by Heretics Nor by Catholics’ / Michael O’Connor -- Conclusion / Michael O’Connor -- Bibliography / Michael O’Connor -- Indexes / Michael O’Connor. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Remembered as the official who failed to keep Luther in the Catholic fold, Tommaso de Vio, Cardinal Cajetan (1469-1534) was a multi-faceted figure whose significance extends beyond those days in Augsburg. In the 1520s, he embarked on a labour of biblical commentary that occupied the final decade of his life, producing over a million words of translation and commentary. Offering an overview of this remarkable body of work, Michael O’Connor argues that Cajetan’s motive was the renewal of Christian living (more ‘Catholic Reform’ than ‘Counter-Reformation’), and that his method was a bold and fresh hybrid of scholasticism and Renaissance humanism, correcting the Vulgate’s errors and expounding the text almost exclusively according to the literal sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |