|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910826597303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Morton Rebecca B. <1954-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Methods and models : a guide to the empirical analysis of formal models in political science / / Rebecca B. Morton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cambridge [England] ; ; New York, : Cambridge University Press, 1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-107-11584-1 |
1-280-43225-X |
0-511-04019-9 |
0-511-17297-4 |
0-511-15191-8 |
0-511-30209-6 |
0-511-61247-8 |
0-511-05119-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (x, 326 pages) : digital, PDF file(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Political science - Mathematical models |
Political statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 295-315) and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Cover; Half-title; Title; Copyright; Contents; Acknowledgments; PART I Introduction; CHAPTER 1 Political Science's Dilemma; PART II Formal Models in Political Science; CHAPTER 2 What Makes a Model Formal?; CHAPTER 3 The Variety of Formal Models; PART III Empirical Evaluation of Formal Models; CHAPTER 4 Fundamentals of Empirical Evaluation; CHAPTER 5 Evaluating Assumptions; CHAPTER 6 Evaluating Predictions: Equilibria, Disequilibria, and Multiequilibria; CHAPTER 7 Evaluating Relationship Predictions; CHAPTER 8 Evaluating Alternative Models; PART IV A Second Revolution; CHAPTER 9 The Present and the Future; References; Name Index; Subject Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
At present much of political science consists of a large body of formal mathematical work that remains largely unexplored empirically and an expanding use of sophisticated statistical techniques. While there are examples of noteworthy efforts to bridge the gap between these, there is still a need for much more cooperative work between formal |
|
|
|
|