1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910826521203321

Autore

Ward Thomas M.

Titolo

John Duns Scotus on parts, wholes, and hylomorphism / / Thomas M. Ward

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Leiden, Netherlands : , : Brill, , 2014

©2014

ISBN

90-04-27897-4

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (210 p.)

Collana

Investigating Medieval Philosophy, , 1879-9787 ; ; Volume 7

Disciplina

111/.1092

Soggetti

Hylomorphism

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Preliminary Material -- Introduction -- The Purpose of Prime Matter -- The Ontology of Prime Matter -- How Matter and Form Compose a Substance—Part I -- How Matter and Form Compose a Substance—Part II -- Scotistic Pluralism about Substantial Form—Part I -- Scotistic Pluralism about Substantial Form—Part II -- Contingent Supposits and Contingent Substances -- The Mereological Status of the Elements in a Mixture -- Why the World is not a Substance -- Scotistic Hylomorphism and the Problem of Homonymy -- Bibliography -- General Index.

Sommario/riassunto

In John Duns Scotus on Parts, Wholes, and Hylomorphism , Thomas M. Ward examines Scotus's arguments for his distinctive version of hylomorphism, the view that at least some material objects are composites of matter and form. It considers Scotus's reasons for adopting hylomorphism, and his accounts of how matter and form compose a substance, how extended parts, such as the organs of an organism, compose a substance, and how other sorts of things, such as the four chemical elements (earth, air, fire, and water) and all the things in the world, fail to compose a substance. It highlights the extent to which Scotus draws on his metaphysics of essential order to explain why some things can compose substance and why others cannot. Throughout the book, contemporary versions of hylomorphism are discussed in ways that both illumine Scotus's own views and suggest ways to advance contemporary debates.