|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910825638703321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Assessment of motor speech disorders / / edited by Anja Lowit and Raymond D. Kent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
San Diego, California ; ; Oxfordshire, [England] : , : Plural Publishing, , 2011 |
|
©2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (413 pages) : illustrations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Articulation disorders - Diagnosis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
The ICF framework and its relevance to the assessment of people with motor speech disorders -- The assessment of intelligibility in motor speech disorders -- Physiological assessment -- Assessment of prosody -- The psychosocial impact of acquired motor speech disorders -- Measurement of communicative participation -- Cognition and its assessment in motor speech disorders -- Conversation analysis and acquired motor speech disorders in everyday interaction -- Telerehabilitation and the assessment of motor speech disorders -- Biodynamics of speech and orofacial movement -- Assessment of rhythm -- Assessment of intonation -- Variability and coordination indices and their applicability to motor speech disorders -- Functional neuroimaging for the investigation of motor speech disorders -- Apraxic failure and the hierarchical structure of speech motor plans : a nonlinear probabilistic model -- Defective neural motor speech mappings as a source for apraxia of speech : evidence from a quantitative neural model of speech processing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Presents a summary of assessment and evaluation techniques for disordered speech, with both a clinical and a research focus. This unique resource reviews research evidence pertaining to best practice in the clinical assessment of established areas such as intelligibility and |
|
|
|
|