Peasant pasts [[electronic resource] ] : history and memory in western India / / Vinayak Chaturvedi

• Record Nr.: UNINA9910824566003321
• Autore: Chaturvedi Vinayak
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: Berkeley, : University of California Press, 2007
• ISBN: 0-520-94059-8; 1-282-77216-3; 9786612772160; 1-4337-0857-4
• Edizione: [1st ed.]
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (331 p.)
• Disciplina: 305.5/6309547
• Soggetti: Dharalas - History - 19th century - Historiography; Dharalas - History - 20th century - Historiography; Dharalas - Political activity; Dharalas - Social conditions - 19th century; Dharalas - Social conditions - 20th century; Nationalism - India - Gujarat - Historiography
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Note generali: Description based upon print version of record.
• Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
• Nota di contenuto: Front matter -- CONTENTS -- ILLUSTRATIONS -- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- INTRODUCTION -- PART ONE -- PART TWO -- PART THREE -- CONCLUSION -- ABBREVIATIONS -- NOTES -- GLOSSARY -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- INDEX
• Sommario/riassunto: Peasant Pasts is an innovative, interdisciplinary approach to writing histories of peasant politics, nationalism, and colonialism. Vinayak Chaturvedi's analysis provides an important intervention in the social and cultural history of India by examining the nature of peasant discourses and practices during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Through rigorous archival study and fieldwork, Chaturvedi shows that peasants in Gujarat were active in the production and circulation of political ideas, establishing critiques of the state and society while promoting complex understandings of political community. By turning to the heartland of M.K. Gandhi's support, Chaturvedi shows that the ; vast majority of peasants were opposed to nationalism in the early decades of the twentieth century. He argues that nationalists in Gujarat established power through the use of coercion and violence, as they imagined a nation in which they could dominate social relations. Chaturvedi suggests that this little told story is necessary to understand not only anticolonial nationalism but the direction of postcolonial nationalism as well.