1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910824336103321

Autore

García-Revillo Miguel García

Titolo

Contentious and Advisory Jurisdiction of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea

Pubbl/distr/stampa

[S.l.] : , : Brill, , 2015

ISBN

90-04-20099-1

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (356 p.)

Disciplina

341.4/5

Soggetti

Jurisdiction (International law)

Law of the sea

Pacific settlement of international disputes

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Preliminary Material -- Introduction -- Principal Jurisdiction (Mainline Jurisdiction or Jurisdiction on the Merits) -- Incidental (Accessory) Jurisdiction -- Regulation -- States Parties. Special Reference to the European Union -- Entities Other Than States Parties. Is the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Competent to Deal with Disputes between Private Entites or Persons? -- Difficulty in Defining the Advisory Jurisdiction of itlos -- Regulation -- The Advisory Jurisdiction Expressly Conferred on Itlos by the Law of the Sea Convention: The Advisory Jurisdiction of the Seabed Disputes Chamber -- Extending the Advisory Jurisdiction of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea by Means of Its Own Rules: The Advisory Jurisdiction of Itlos Itself -- Bibliography -- Index.

Sommario/riassunto

In The Contentious and Advisory Jurisdiction of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea , Miguel García García-Revillo offers an in-depth examination of all relevant facets of the jurisdiction of this important international judicial institution. Created by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, ITLOS plays an essential role not only in respect to the interpretation of this major international treaty but also to the contemporary law of the sea in general. The book covers both the contentious (ratione materiae, ratione personae, mainline, incidental, compulsory, not compulsory) and the advisory jurisdiction of ITLOS, which are analysed not only from a theoretical



perspective but also in light of the own Tribunal's jurisprudence.