1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910822810003321

Titolo

Clio/anthropos [[electronic resource] ] : exploring the boundaries between history and anthropology / / edited by Andrew Willford and Eric Tagliacozzo

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Stanford, Calif., : Stanford University Press, c2009

ISBN

0-8047-7240-1

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (313 p.)

Altri autori (Persone)

WillfordAndrew C (Andrew Clinton)

TagliacozzoEric

Disciplina

909/.04

Soggetti

Ethnohistory

Anthropology and history

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Introduction : history and anthropology--strange bedfellows / Eric Tagliacozzo and Andrew Willford -- In search of the colonial subject / David Arnold -- Laughing at Leviathan : John Furnivall, Dutch New Guinea, and the ridiculousness of colonial rule / Danilyn Rutherford -- Export ceramics in Philippine societies : historical and ethnographic perspectives / Eric Tagliacozzo -- Chronotopes of a dystopic nation : the birth of "dependency" in late Porfirian Mexico / Claudio Lomnitz -- Foretelling ethnicity in Trinidad : the post emancipation "labor problem" / Viranjini Munasinghe -- The nationalization of ethnology : Japan and China in Manchuria / Prasenjit Duara -- The figure of the Tamil in modern Malaysia / Andrew Willford -- Unsettled stories and inadequate metaphors : the movement to historical anthropology / David William Cohen.

Sommario/riassunto

The intersection between history and anthropology is more varied now than it has ever been—a look at the shelves of bookstores and libraries proves this. Historians have increasingly looked to the methodologies of anthropologists to explain inequalities of power, problems of voicelessness, and conceptions of social change from an inside perspective. And ethnologists have increasingly relied on longitudinal visions of their subjects, inquiries framed by the lens of history rather



than purely structuralist, culturalist, or functionalist visions of behavior. The contributors have dealt with the problems and possibilities of the blurring of these boundaries in different and exciting ways. They provide further fodder for a cross-disciplinary experiment that is already well under way, describing peoples and their cultures in a world where boundaries are evermore fluid but where we all are alarmingly attached to the cataloguing and marking of national, ethnic, racial, and religious differences.