1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910822561403321

Autore

Bennette Rebecca Ayako <1973->

Titolo

Diagnosing dissent : hysterics, deserters, and conscientious objectors in Germany during World War One / / Rebecca Ayako Bennette

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Ithaca : , : Cornell University Press, , 2021

ISBN

1-5017-5121-2

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (241 pages) : map

Collana

Cornell scholarship online

Disciplina

940.3/161

Soggetti

Military psychiatry - Germany - History - 20th century

World War, 1914-1918 - Psychological aspects

Soldiers - Germany - Psychology

War neuroses - Germany - History - 20th century

World War, 1914-1918 - Desertions - Germany - Psychological aspects

World War, 1914-1918 - Conscientious objectors - Germany - Psychology

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Previously issued in print: 2020.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Antecedents : Psychiatry, the Military, and Pacifism in Late Imperial Germany -- Hysterics and Other Patients : Diagnosis, Treatment, and Negotiation -- Deserters : Delinquency, Psychological Disorder, and Dissent -- Conscientious Objectors : Objects of Examination and Epilogue.

Sommario/riassunto

Although physicians during World War I, and scholars since, have addressed the idea of disorders such as shell shock as inchoate flights into sickness by men unwilling to cope with war's privations, they have given little attention to the agency many soldiers actually possessed to express dissent in a system that medicalized it. In Germany, these men were called Kriegszitterer, or 'war tremblers,' for their telltale symptom of uncontrollable shaking. Based on archival research that constitutes the largest study of psychiatric patient files from 1914 to 1918, 'Diagnosing Dissent' examines the important space that wartime psychiatry provided soldiers expressing objection to the war. Rebecca Ayako Bennette argues that the treatment of these soldiers was far less dismissive of real ailments and more conducive to individual



expression of protest than we have previously thought.