1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910821249503321

Autore

Sy Amadou

Titolo

Distance-to-Default in Banking : : A Bridge Too Far? / / Amadou Sy, Jorge Chan-Lau

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Washington, D.C. : , : International Monetary Fund, , 2006

ISBN

1-4623-5181-6

1-4527-7738-1

1-283-51164-9

1-4519-0928-4

9786613824097

Edizione

[1st ed.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (19 p.)

Collana

IMF Working Papers

Altri autori (Persone)

Chan-LauJorge

Soggetti

Bank capital - Econometric models

Bank failures - Econometric models

Default (Finance) - Econometric models

Risk - Econometric models

Banks and Banking

Financial Risk Management

Public Finance

Banks

Depository Institutions

Micro Finance Institutions

Mortgages

Financial Institutions and Services: Government Policy and Regulation

Trade Policy

International Trade Organizations

International Financial Markets

Banking

Financial services law & regulation

Public finance & taxation

Economic & financial crises & disasters

Finance

Capital adequacy requirements

Post-clearance customs audit

Deposit insurance

Asset valuation

Banks and banking

Asset requirements



Customs administration

Crisis management

Asset-liability management

United States

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

"September 2006."

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references.

Nota di contenuto

""Contents""; ""I. INTRODUCTION""; ""II. WHAT HAPPENS BEFORE A BANK DEFAULT?""; ""III. A UNIFIED FRAMEWORK FOR DISTANCE MEASURES : DISTANCE-TO-CAPITAL""; ""IV. CASE STUDY: THE RESONA AND ASHIKAGA BANKS""; ""V. CONCLUSIONS""; ""REFERENCES""

Sommario/riassunto

In contrast to corporate defaults, regulators typically take a number of statutory actions to avoid the large fiscal costs associated with bank defaults. The distance-to-default, a widely used market-based measure of corporate default risk, ignores such regulatory actions. To overcome this limitation, this paper introduces the concept of distance-to-capital that accounts for pre-default regulatory actions such as those in a prompt-corrective-actions framework. We show that both risk measures can be analyzed using the same theoretical framework but differ depending on the level of capital adequacy thresholds and asset volatility. We also use the framework to illustrate pre-default regulatory actions in Japan in 2001-03.