| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910819868303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Romalis John |
|
|
Titolo |
Will the Doha Round Lead to Preference Erosion? / / John Romalis, Mary Amiti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Washington, D.C. : , : International Monetary Fund, , 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-4623-6899-9 |
1-4527-5015-7 |
1-283-44979-X |
9786613823649 |
1-4519-0806-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (41 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Tariff preferences - Developing countries - Econometric models |
Exports - Developing countries - Econometric models |
Exports and Imports |
Taxation |
Economic Theory |
Trade Policy |
International Trade Organizations |
Empirical Studies of Trade |
Economic Integration |
Trade: General |
Neoclassical Models of Trade |
Agriculture: Aggregate Supply and Demand Analysis |
Prices |
Public finance & taxation |
International economics |
Economic theory & philosophy |
Tariffs |
Exports |
Comparative advantage |
Demand elasticity |
Imports |
Taxes |
International trade |
Economic theory |
Tariff |
Elasticity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 38-39). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
""Contents""; ""I. INTRODUCTION""; ""II. DATA DESCRIPTION AND RESEARCH STRATEGY""; ""III. RESULTS""; ""IV. CONCLUSIONS""; ""REFERENCES"" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This paper assesses the effects of reducing tariffs under the Doha Round on market access for developing countries. It shows that for many developing countries, actual preferential access is less generous than it appears because of low product coverage or complex rules of origin. Thus lowering tariffs under the multilateral system is likely to lead to a net increase in market access for many developing countries, with gains in market access offsetting losses from preference erosion. Furthermore, comparing various tariff-cutting proposals, the research shows that the largest gains in market access are generated by higher tariff cuts in agriculture. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |