|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910819701403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Davis Stephen R. <1977-> |
|
|
Titolo |
The ANC's war against apartheid : Umkhonto we Sizwe and the liberation of South Africa / / Stephen R. Davis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Bloomington, Indiana : , : Indiana University Press, , 2018 |
|
©2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (251 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Anti-apartheid movements - South Africa |
Government, Resistance to - South Africa |
South Africa History 1961-1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction -- A brief history of Umkhonto we Sizwe and the armed struggle -- "I am not prepared to answer at this stage" : history, evidence, and the Mamre camp, December 26-30, 1962 -- The sight of battle : visuality, history, and representations of the Wankie campaign, July 31-September 8, 1967 -- Losing the plot : mystery, narrativity, and investigation in Novo Catengue, May 1977-March 1979 -- Everyday life during wartime : experience, modes of writing, and the underground in Cape Town during the long decade of the 1980's -- Conclusion: making the struggle concrete: nationalist historiography at Freedom Park. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
For nearly three decades, Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK), the armed wing of the African National Congress (ANC), waged a violent revolutionary struggle against the apartheid state in South Africa. Stephen Davis works with extensive oral testimonies and the heroic myths that were constructed after 1994 to offer a new history of this armed movement. Davis deftly addresses the histories that reinforce the legitimacy of the ANC as a ruling party, its longstanding entanglement with the South African Communist Party, and efforts to consolidate a single narrative of struggle and renewal in concrete museums and memorials. Davis shows that the history of MK is more complicated and ambiguous than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
previous laudatory accounts would have us believe, and in doing so he discloses the contradictions of the liberation struggle as well as its political manifestations. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |