|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910818093403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Shachar Ayelet <1966-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Multicultural jurisdictions : cultural differences and women's rights / / Ayelet Shachar [[electronic resource]] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-107-11952-9 |
1-280-42124-X |
0-511-17406-3 |
0-511-04080-6 |
0-511-15361-9 |
0-511-32796-X |
0-511-49033-X |
0-511-04966-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (xiv, 193 pages) : digital, PDF file(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Contemporary political theory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Women - Legal status, laws, etc |
Multiculturalism - Law and legislation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 166-186) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction -- The perils of multicultural accommodation -- Family law and the construction of collective identity -- State vs. nomos: lessons from contemporary law and normative theory -- Sharing the pieces of jurisdictional authority: mapping the possibilities -- Transformative accomodation: utilizing external protections to reduce internal restrictions -- Towards a resolution of the multiculturalism paradox: family law revisited -- Conclusion --Appendix: How transformative accommodation works in different social arenas. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Is it possible for the state simultaneously to respect deep cultural differences and to protect the hard-won citizenship rights of vulnerable group members, particularly women? This 2001 book argues that it is not only theoretically needed, but also institutionally feasible. Rejecting prevalent normative and legal solutions to this 'paradox of multicultural vulnerability', Multicultural Jurisdictions develops a powerful argument |
|
|
|
|