|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910817540003321 |
|
|
Autore |
Backhouse Janet |
|
|
Titolo |
Dilemmas of solidarity : rethinking redistribution in the Canadian federation / / editors, Sujit Choudhry, Jean-François Gaudreault-DesBiens, Lorne Sossin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Toronto ; ; Buffalo ; ; London : , : University of Toronto Press, , 2006 |
|
©2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-8020-9407-4 |
1-281-99206-2 |
9786611992064 |
1-4426-7392-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (227 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Income distribution - Canada |
Electronic books. |
Canada Economic conditions Regional disparities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Social justice and the politics of redistribution -- Taxation and the search for redistribution -- The spending power and the constitutional architecture of redistribution. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Since the rise of the Canadian welfare state in the aftermath of the Second World War, the politics of social policy and fiscal federalism have been at the centre of federal-provincial relations. Recent events have given impetus for scholars to re-examine these issues. In 2002, the Quebec Commission on Fiscal Imbalance released its report, which introduced the term 'vertical fiscal imbalance' into the vocabulary of Canadian politics. Essentially, the commission determined that a disjunction between revenue-raising capacity and expenditures involving different orders of government - vertical fiscal imbalance - was an urgent problem that must be addressed. Dilemmas of Solidarity is both a reflection on and response to that finding.Editors Sujit Choudhry, Jean-Francois Graudreault-Desbiens, and Lorne Sossin bring together an array of respected legal and political scholars to reflect on |
|
|
|
|