1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910817091603321

Autore

Mitchell Sara McLaughlin

Titolo

Domestic law goes global : legal traditions and international courts / / Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, Emilia Justyna Powell

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2011

ISBN

1-107-22093-9

1-139-06378-2

1-139-08300-7

1-139-08073-3

1-283-11305-8

1-139-07617-5

0-511-78303-5

9786613113054

1-139-07044-4

1-139-07846-1

Edizione

[1st ed.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (xiv, 263 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)

Classificazione

POL011000

Disciplina

341.5/5

Soggetti

International courts

International law

International and municipal law

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

The creation and expansion of international courts -- Major legal traditions of the world -- A rational legal design theory of international adjudication -- Domestic legal traditions and the creation of the International Criminal Court -- Domestic legal traditions and state support for the World Court -- The rational design of state commitments to international courts -- The consequences of support for international courts -- Conclusion.

Sommario/riassunto

International courts have proliferated in the international system, with over one hundred judicial or quasi-judicial bodies in existence today. This book develops a rational legal design theory of international adjudication in order to explain the variation in state support for



international courts. Initial negotiators of new courts, 'originators', design international courts in ways that are politically and legally optimal. States joining existing international courts, 'joiners', look to the legal rules and procedures to assess the courts' ability to be capable, fair and unbiased. The authors demonstrate that the characteristics of civil law, common law and Islamic law influence states' acceptance of the jurisdiction of international courts, the durability of states' commitments to international courts, and the design of states' commitments to the courts. Furthermore, states strike cooperative agreements most effectively in the shadow of an international court that operates according to familiar legal principles and rules.