|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910816791603321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Egalitarianism [[electronic resource] ] : new essays on the nature and value of equality / / edited by Nils Holtug and Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Oxford ; ; New York, : Clarendon Press, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-383-04400-7 |
0-19-160884-X |
1-280-75633-0 |
0-19-151632-5 |
1-4294-6014-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (352 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
HoltugNils <1964-> |
Lippert-RasmussenKasper <1964-> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
"Most of the chapters in this book were presented at a conference on egalitarianism at the University of Copenhagen in 2004"--Pref. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
An introduction to contemporary egalitarianism / Nils Holtug and Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen -- A foundation for egalitarianism / Thomas Christiano -- A defence of extreme egalitarianism / Ingmar Persson -- The insignificance of the distinction between Telic and Deontic egalitarianism / Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen -- Prioritarianism / Nils Holtug -- Egalitarianism and the difference between interpersonal and intrapersonal judgments / Dennis McKerlie -- Who are the least advantaged? / Bertil Tungodden and Peter Vallentyne -- Feminist distributive justice and the relevance of equal relations / Linda Barclay -- Of mice and men : equality and animals / Peter Vallentyne -- Liberty, liability, and contractualism / Andrew Williams -- Desert and equality / Richard J. Arneson -- Market failure, common interests, and the titanic puzzle / Jonathan Wolff -- The 'what' and the 'how' of distributive justice and health / Susan Hurley. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Egalitarianism, the view that equality matters, attracts a great deal of attention amongst contemporary political theorists. And yet it has |
|
|
|
|