|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910816249903321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Linguistic relativity in SLA : thinking for speaking / / edited by ZhaoHong Han and Teresa Cadierno |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Bristol, : Multilingual Matters, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-84769-399-7 |
1-282-65717-8 |
9786612657177 |
1-84769-278-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (230 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Second language acquisition ; ; 50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classificazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
HanZhaohong <1962-> |
CadiernoTeresa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Second language acquisition |
Language and languages - Usage |
Psycholinguistics |
Language and culture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Contributors -- Preface -- Chapter 1: Motion in Danish as a Second Language: Does the Learner’s L1 Make a Difference? -- Chapter 2: The Role of Thinking for Speaking in Adult L2 Speech: The Case of (Non)unidirectionality Encoding by American Learners of Russian -- Chapter 3: Can an L2 Speaker’s Patterns of Thinking for Speaking Change? -- Chapter 4: Thinking for Speaking and Immediate Memory for Spatial Relations -- Chapter 5: The Gloss Trap -- Chapter 6: Linguistic Effects on Thinking for Writing: The Case of Articles in L2 English -- Chapter 7: Grammatical Morpheme Inadequacy as a Function of Linguistic Relativity: A Longitudinal Case Study -- Chapter 8: Conclusion: On the Interdependence of Conceptual Transfer and Relativity Studies -- References -- Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Crosslinguistic influence is an established area of second language research, and as such, it has been subject to extensive scrutiny. Although the field has come a long way in understanding its general character, many issues still remain a conundrum, for example, why |
|
|
|
|