|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910815754403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Nykänen Eeva |
|
|
Titolo |
Fragmented state power and forced migration [[electronic resource] ] : a study on non-state actors in refugee law / / by Eeva Nykänen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Leiden [Holland] ; ; Boston, : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-280-87613-1 |
9786613717443 |
90-04-22885-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (399 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Refugees - Legal status, laws, etc - Europe |
Asylum, Right of - Europe |
Forced migration - Europe |
Non-state actors (International relations) - Europe |
Human rights - Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Normative foundations of the system of international protection in Europe -- Normative foundations of the system of international protection in Europe -- Non-state actors and the refugee definition -- The European Convention on Human Rights, prohibition Of refoulement, and non-state actors -- Subsidiary protection and non-state actors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The relative decline of state power and the increase in the significance of various non-state actors is one of the greatest challenges faced by the legal framework for the international protection of refugees and other forced migrants over previous decades. A large number of asylum seekers applying for protection in Europe and other industrialized states originate from countries where the state structure is weak, if not non-existent, and where the threats faced by individuals stem primarily from actors other than the state authorities. The legal framework for international protection, which rests on a state-centric paradigm, is struggling with claims for protection arising from such situations. Drawing extensively on international and European law, international |
|
|
|
|