|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910815648403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Sagos Nick C. |
|
|
Titolo |
Democracy, emergency, and arbitrary coercion : a liberal Republican view / / by Nick C. Sagos |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Leiden, Netherlands : , : Brill, , 2015 |
|
©2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (235 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Studies in Moral Philosophy, , 2211-2014 ; ; Volume 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Crisis management in government |
Emergency management - Government policy |
Democracy - Philosophy |
Democracy - Moral and ethical aspects |
Liberalism - Philosophy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Preliminary Material / Nick C. Sagos -- Introduction: Two Philosophical Ideals of Liberal Democracy / Nick C. Sagos -- Constitutional Democracy and the Issue of Emergency / Nick C. Sagos -- Law and the Concept of Emergency / Nick C. Sagos -- Formal and Informal Emergency / Nick C. Sagos -- Catastrophe and Emergency / Nick C. Sagos -- Institutions, Rights, and Emergencies / Nick C. Sagos -- Appendix: Notes on Methodology / Nick C. Sagos -- Bibliography / Nick C. Sagos -- Index / Nick C. Sagos. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
States of emergency are declared by governments with alarming frequency. When they are declared, it is taken for granted that their nature is understood. This book argues against this established view. Instead, the view advanced here analyzes what makes emergencies different from other types of similar events. Defending a hybrid liberal/republican approach, the book proposes that states of emergency are in fact poorly understood and therefore needlessly mismanaged when they occur. This mismanagement leads to a troubling derogation of established liberal democratic rights in the name of an unattainable form of hollow security. Further, the book |
|
|
|
|