|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910815242803321 |
|
|
Autore |
Love Nigel |
|
|
Titolo |
Generative phonology : a case-study from French / / Nigel Love |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Amsterdam, : John Benjamins B.V., 1981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-283-32890-9 |
9786613328908 |
90-272-8090-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (249 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Lingvisticæ investigationes. Supplementa ; ; v. 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
French language - Phonology |
French language - Grammar, Generative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
U.S. place of publication stamped on t.p. |
Revision of thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oxford. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
GENERATIVE PHONOLOGYA Case-Study from French; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; PREFACE; Table of contents; INTRODUCTION; FINAL SEGMENTS AND GENDER INFLECTION IN FRENCH; 1. THE DELETION RULES; 1.1 Liaison as non-deletion; 1.2 Liaison as metathesis; 1.3 Liaison as syntax; 2. EXCEPTIONS TO THE DELETION RULES; 2.1 There are exceptions to the deletion rules; 2.2 There are no exceptions to the deletion rules; 2.3 There are exceptions to the deletion rules; 3. INVARIANT ADJECTIVES; 3.1 Vowel-final stems; 3.2 Consonant-final stems; 4. THE SCOPE OF THE DELETION RULES |
4.1 Nasals and nasalisation4.2 Derivational augments and 'secondary derivation'·; 5. ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS; 5.1 There is no consonant deletion rule: liaison as epenthesis; 5.2 There is a (minor) consonant deletion rule; 6. THE FUNCTIONAL UNITY OF ELISION AND LIAISON; 6.1 Elision and liaison as natural rules; 6.2 Elision and liaison as conspiratorial rules; 7. SUMMARY; 7.1 Final segments; 7.2 Gender inflection; CONCLUSION; REFERENCES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This study is a discussion of, rather than a contribution to, generative phonology. The central question posed, is: Does linguistic theory provide a basis for choosing between competing grammars - that is, an evaluation procedure for grammars? If so, then what is its form? If not, |
|
|
|
|