1.

Record Nr.

UNISALENTO991002234439707536

Titolo

Real analytic and algebraic geometry [e-book] : proceedings of the conference held in Trento, Italy, october 3-7, 1988 / edited by Margherita Galbiati, Alberto Tognoli

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Berlin : Springer, 1990

ISBN

9783540469520

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (iv, 366 p.)

Collana

Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 0075-8434 ; 1420

Classificazione

AMS 14G30

AMS 32C

AMS 58A07

Altri autori (Persone)

Galbiati, Margherita

Tognoli, Alberto

Disciplina

516.35

Soggetti

Mathematics

Geometry, algebraic

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Risorsa elettronica

Livello bibliografico

Monografia



2.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910815123003321

Autore

Al-Azem Talal

Titolo

Rule-formulation and binding precedent in the madhhab-law tradition : Ibn Qutlubugha's commentary on the compendium of Quduri / / Talal Al-Azem

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Leiden ; ; Boston : , : Brill, , [2016]

ISBN

90-04-32329-5

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (273 pages) : illustrations (some color), graphs

Collana

Islamicate intellectual history ; ; v. 2

Disciplina

340.59

Soggetti

Islamic law - Interpretation and construction

Hanafites

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Front Matter -- Introduction -- Authors -- History -- Theory -- Practice -- Conclusion -- The Writings of Qudūrī -- Jurists Cited by Ibn Quṭlūbughā -- Works Cited by Ibn Quṭlūbughā -- Bibliography -- Index.

Sommario/riassunto

In Rule-Formulation and Binding Precedent in the Madhhab-Law Tradition , Talal Al-Azem argues for the existence of a madhhab -law tradition’ of jurisprudence underpinning the four post-classical Sunni schools of law. This tradition celebrated polyvalence by preserving the multiplicity of conflicting opinions within each school, while simultaneously providing a process of rule formulation ( tarjīḥ ) by which one opinion is chosen as the binding precedent ( taqlīd ). The predominant forum of both activities, he shows, was the legal commentary. Through a careful reading of Ibn Quṭlūbughā's (d. 879/1474) al-Taṣḥīḥ wa-al-tarjīḥ , Al-Azem presents a new periodisation of the Ḥanafī madhhab , analyses the theory of rule formulation, and demonstrates how this madhhab -law tradition facilitated both continuity and legal change while serving as the basis of a pluralistic Mamluk judicial system.