1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910814485503321

Autore

Maisel Louis Sandy <1945->

Titolo

Evaluating campaign quality : can the electoral process be improved? / / L. Sandy Maisel, Darrell M. West, Brett M. Clifton

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Cambridge ; ; New York, : Cambridge University Press, 2007

ISBN

1-107-18293-X

1-280-91730-X

9786610917303

0-511-29049-7

0-511-28989-8

0-511-28861-1

0-511-32244-5

0-511-61120-X

0-511-28929-4

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (xiv, 155 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)

Collana

Communication, society, and politics

Altri autori (Persone)

WestDarrell M. <1954->

CliftonBrett M. <1972->

Disciplina

324.70973

Soggetti

Political campaigns - United States

Elections - United States

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 08 Oct 2015).

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references (p. 145-151) and index.

Nota di contenuto

Preface -- Campaign reformers: optimists, skeptics, and rejectionists -- Dissemination of campaign practices -- Impact on campaign conduct -- Impact on campaign discourse -- Impact on public perceptions -- Improving the system -- Appendices: A. Data and methodology -- B. Public opinion survey -- C. Consultant survey -- Focus group protocol.

Sommario/riassunto

For a number of years, voters and academic observers have been dissatisfied with a number of elements of American campaigns. Contemporary races are seen as too negative, too superficial, and too unfair or misleading. Based on these complaints, a variety of reform organizations have targeted millions of dollars to improve the situation. Through their efforts and those within the academic community, a wide



range of reform initiatives have been undertaken, such as voluntary codes of conduct, industry self-regulation, certificate programs, tougher ethics rules for consultants, and the encouragement of more substantive venues. This book seeks to evaluate whether these activities have improved the level of campaign discourse and conduct in US House and Senate campaigns and argues that while individual reform efforts have achieved some of their stated objectives, the overall effect of these reform efforts has been disappointing.