|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910814369003321 |
|
|
Titolo |
The new Wittgenstein / / edited by Alice Crary and Rupert Read |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
London ; ; New York, : Routledge, 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-134-68995-0 |
0-585-45260-1 |
0-203-44940-1 |
1-280-05727-0 |
1-134-68996-9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (414 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
CraryAlice <1967-> |
ReadRupert J. <1966-> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 389-394) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Book Cover; Title; Contents; List of contributors; Acknowledgements; Introduction; Wittgenstein's later writings: the illusory comfort of an external standpoint; Excursus on Wittgenstein's vision of language; Non-cognitivism and rule-following; Wittgenstein on rules and platonism; What 'There can be no such thing as meaning anything by any word' could possibly mean; Wittgenstein on deconstruction; Wittgenstein's philosophy in relation to political thought; The Tractatus as forerunner of Wittgenstein's later writings; Ethics, imagination and the method of Wittgenstein's Tractatus |
Elucidation and nonsense in Frege and early Wittgenstein Rethinking mathematical necessity; Wittgenstein, mathematics and philosophy; Does Bismarck have a beetle in his box? The private language argument in the Tractatus; How to do things with wood: Wittgenstein, Frege and the problem of illogical thought; Conceptions of nonsense in Carnap and Wittgenstein; A dissenting voice; Was he trying to whistle it?; Bibliography; Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
A stellar collection of essays that presents a significantly different portrait of Wittgenstein and sheds light on the relation between his thought and different philosophical positions and areas of human |
|
|
|
|