|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910813410903321 |
|
|
Autore |
Ruthven K. K |
|
|
Titolo |
Faking literature / / K.K. Ruthven |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cambridge ; ; New York, : Cambridge University Press, 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-107-11775-5 |
1-280-15390-3 |
0-511-11787-6 |
0-511-01865-7 |
0-511-15638-3 |
0-511-30410-2 |
0-511-48320-1 |
0-511-04846-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (x, 237 pages) : digital, PDF file(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
English literature - History and criticism - Theory, etc |
Literary forgeries and mystifications - History |
Literature - History and criticism - Theory, etc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 201-226) and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
1. Sampling the spurious -- 2. Framing literary forgery -- 3. Cultivating spuriosity -- 4. Faultlines of authorship -- 5. Fantasies of originality -- 6. Rhetorics of authenticity -- 7. Fake literature as critique. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Literary forgeries are usually regarded as spurious versions of genuine literature. Faking Literature, first published in 2001, argues that the production of a literary forgery is an act that reveals the spurious nature of literature itself. Literature has long been under attack because of its alliance with rhetoric (the art of persuasion) rather than with logic and ethics. One way of deflecting such attacks is to demonise literary forgery: literature acquires the illusion of authenticity by being dissociated from what are represented as ersatz approximations of the real thing. Ruthven argues that literary forgery is the creative manifestation of cultural critique. As a powerful indictment of dubious practices in such activities as literary criticism, book-reviewing and the |
|
|
|
|