1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910812771103321

Autore

Jarvie Paul <1949, >

Titolo

Ready to trample on all human law : financial capitalism in the fiction of Charles Dickens / / Paul A. Jarvie

Pubbl/distr/stampa

New York : , : Routledge, , 2005

ISBN

1-135-48851-7

1-135-48844-4

0-203-95917-5

Edizione

[1st ed.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (216 p.)

Collana

Studies in major literary authors

Disciplina

823/.8

Soggetti

Capitalism and literature - Great Britain - History - 19th century

Capitalists and financiers in literature

Economics in literature

Finance in literature

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references (pages 195-200) and index.

Nota di contenuto

Cover; Title Page; Copyright Page; Dedication; Table of Contents; Acknowledgments; Introduction Dickens's Evolving Critique of Financial Capitalism; Chapter One ""I hold myself released from such hard bargains as these"": Nicholas Nickleby and ""Brotherly"" Capitalism; Chapter Two ""With what astrange mastery it seized him for itself"": The Conversion of the Financier in A Christmas Carol; Chapter Three ""Terribly wild rang the panic cry"": Finance, Panic and the Struggle for Life in Little Dorrit

Chapter Four ""Among the dying and the dead"": Metonymy and Finance Capitalism in Our Mutual FriendConclusion; Notes; Works Cited; Index

Sommario/riassunto

This book explores the relationship between Dickens's novels and the financial system. Elements of Dickens's work form a critique of financial capitalism. This critique is rooted in the difference between use-value and exchange-value, and in the difference between productive circulations and mere accumulation. In a money-based society, exchange-value and accumulation dominate to the point where they infect even the most important and sacred relationships between parts of society and individuals. This study explores Dickens's critique from



two very different points of view. The first