|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910812686803321 |
|
|
Autore |
Scroggs Stephen K. <1954-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Army relations with Congress : thick armor, dull sword, slow horse / / Stephen K. Scroggs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Westport, Conn. : , : Prager, , 2000 |
|
London : , : Bloomsbury Publishing, , 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
979-82-16-18664-9 |
1-4408-2658-7 |
1-282-40522-5 |
9786612405228 |
0-313-01926-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (288 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Civil-military relations - United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [253]-254) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Contents; Preface; Acknowledgments; 1. Introduction: Liaising versus Lobbying; 2. Roles of Legislative Liaison and Military Service Liaisers; 3. Patterns of Army-Congressional Relations; 4. Army Cultural Dimensions: An Inward-Looking Team Player; 5. M1A1 Tank Transfer: Culture Impedes Army Effectiveness on the Hill; 6. Findings and Recommendations; Epilogue; Appendix A: Research Interviews (as of 1995); Appendix B: Washington Experience Leadership Sample Comparisons for U.S. Military Services in 1995: Data Used in Compilation of Figures Used for Tables 4-1-4.4 |
Appendix C: Army Washington Experience Leadership Sample Run, 1980-81 Era: Data Used in Compilation of Figures Used for Table 4-5For Further Reading; Index; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; R; S; T; U; V; W; Z |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Relying on extensive candid interviews from members of Congress and staff on defense authorization committees and senior Army general officers, Scroggs provides a strong insider analysis with recommendations. He examines the impact of culture on the varying abilities of public agencies, specifically the Army, to pursue its |
|
|
|
|