|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910812002303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Schwartz Bernard <1923-1997, > |
|
|
Titolo |
The unpublished opinions of the Warren court / / Bernard Schwartz |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York, New York ; ; Oxford, [England] : , : Oxford University Press, , 1985 |
|
©1985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-280-43984-X |
0-19-536520-8 |
1-60129-582-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (483 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
SchwartzBernard <1923-1997.> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Judicial opinions - United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Contents; Introduction: The Warren Court and Its Members; 1. Alton v. Alton (1954): Consensual Divorce Manqué; 2. Dayton v. Dulles (1958): ""Faceless Informers"" and Due Process; 3. Perez v. Brownell and Trop v. Dulles (1958): Expatriation and Congressional Power; 4. Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez (1963): Expatriation as Punishment; 5. Bell v. Maryland (1964): Civil Rights versus Property Rights; 6. Estes v. Texas (1965): Television in the Courtroom; 7. Griswold v. Connecticut (1965): Penumbras and Privacy; 8. Time, Inc. v. Hill (1967): Privacy Suits and the First Amendment |
9. Shapiro v. Thompson (1969): Rational Basis, Compelling Interest, and Fundamental Rights10. Maxwell v. Bishop (1969): The Death Penalty in the Warren Court; 11. Brown v. Board of Education (1954, 1955): The Drafting Process in a Landmark Case |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
An important contribution to constitutional literature, this collection of ten unpublished decisions by the Warren Court puts the decision making process of the Supreme Court in a new light. By following the major changes that occur in each case from the circulation of tentative majorityopinions to the final issuance of opinion, the book portrays how the justices communicate with each other and how they are influenced by each other's arguments. Interpretations and |
|
|
|
|